There are always a large amount of websites on the market that utilize the word "future" in their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is recommended often by print publishers and editors that the word "future" is a great word to used in titles, as it grabs people's attention. But, when people utilize the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I think they are.
Recently, an editor of the next of things type website asked me to write a column, in reviewing the internet site I discovered it to be underwhelming on the futuristic aspect, and more heavy into the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is seriously interested in "The Future" then why are all the articles about new scientific innovations in the current period or happening today? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It appears like they're seriously interested in scientific discovery that's already happened, not what will maintain the future. That's just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I do believe they could do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to make people think, worried that you will get past an acceptable limit from your mainstream, quote "core" number of viewers, which I think they do not even understand.
Of course, being an entrepreneur, I understand why they take action this way. It is basically because they wish to earn money and thus sink to a diminished degree of readership, while still pretending to share with you the ongoing future of stuff. Once the editor wished to protect such comments, the indication was that your website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I observe that your website is mainly a news site and I ask what does which have to do with the ongoing future of stuff? Shouldn't the internet site be called NSIN.com or something that way; for New Science Innovation News? If your website is all about Science News and is an accumulation of everyone else's news, then it is just a copy site of a variety that is already getting used and not unique. Thus, the content is therefore the same, so even if the articles are written more clearly and easier to comprehend, that is nice, still what's the worthiness to a "science news junky" as you can find hardly any articles on the internet site compared using their competition?
If they called their selves a news site, then you might have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the near future or they could keep consitently the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This will be a lesson to all "Futuristic" type websites as a case study. If you take the near future thinkers to your website and have nothing to show them, they will leave. If you use trickery to obtain regular readers there, you're doing an extreme disservice to the ongoing future of mankind, by promoting present inventions whilst the be all end all. In any event, it's unethical to use this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment